Tim and Jon begin the episode (0-12:30) discussing why its a big deal to think of humanity being made in the “image of God.” Tim and Jon speculate on what separates man from animals. And whether there were vegetarians in the ancient world.
In the second part of the show (12:30-23:40), Jon ponders the juxtaposition of viewing life as a competition vs viewing it as an opportunity to do social justice. Tim discusses the social justice themes of Jesus in the gospel of Luke. Tim also outlines, the unique justice of Jesus dying on the cross.
The final act of the show (23:40-end) the guys discuss what the Christian response is after Jesus’ death and resurrection. Tim says the people of Jesus should be at the forefront of creating and doing social justice to create a better society in which all people are honored as sacred and divine images of God.
Thank you to our supporters!
Link to our Justice video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A14THPoc4-4
Podcast Date: October 23, 2017
Speakers in the audio file:
Jon: Hey, this is Jon from The Bible Project. Today we're going to continue our
conversation on biblical justice. There are two terms in the Bible, justice, and
righteousness, and they're coupled together when talking about Bibles view
of a just society.
What it looks like is pretty clear. It's a society that takes care of the
vulnerable, specifically the widow, the orphan, the poor, and the immigrant,
or what theologians have called the quartet of the vulnerable. In this episode,
we're going to look at Jesus and how he carries this rich tradition of biblical
Tim: Jesus comes on to the scene, embodies this prophetic vision of mishpat. He's
constantly moving towards the vulnerable and including them first. The
Gospel of Luke intentionally turns up the volume on that part of Jesus's
mission as good news for the poor. It's a mishpat for poor.
Jon: We're going to talk about Jesus, his mission of justice, and why it's crucial for
us to think of humans as being made in the image of God. Here we go.
How does this come to its climax in Jesus? That's what we haven't talked
Tim: No, no, we haven't even talked about Jesus. Maybe I can just do a quick
breeze through what I think the storyline could be like.
Tim: In the way the Bible works as a unified story, all of this is rooted in humans as
the image of God.
Jon: The ones who are supposed to be ruling the world on God's people?
Tim: Yeah. What makes a human different from praying mantis, in Annie Dillard's
Jon: Many things?
Tim: Yeah, there's a lot of things. But in terms of the Bible's vision of what humans
are, humans uniquely are the divine image representations of God appointed
to be responsible and steward and rule over the world and its resources in a
way that no other species has proved capable. Even though many other
species of creatures are more powerful than we are.
Jon: They don't have the intelligence.
Tim: Yeah, they don't have the brain.
Jon: The prefrontal quartets.
Tim: That's right. The biblical vision of justice and right relationship, underneath it
all, is what's going on and pages 1 and 2 of the Bible with humans have...How
we treat each other is supposed to be different than how praying mantises
treat each other. It's because of the image...You have Genesis 1—
Jon: Praying mantises are the ones where the female eats the husband, right?
Tim: I know. I was just thinking about this.
Jon: After mating.
Tim: Where this comes out and page 1 is "let us make humanity on our image, let
them rule over the creatures" and that kind of thing. Humans are God's
image. They represent God and are responsible. But where that comes out
actually is in chapter 9 of Genesis. This thing about the sacred value of life in
chapter 9 where after getting off the boat, Noah and his family, God
recommissioned Noah as a new Adam. It's like creation's been washed and
renewed, and Noah is blessed and gets the same commission as humanity on
Except there's a couple things different and one of them is the ideal humanity
from Noah onwards doesn't have to be vegan. Ideal humanity is vegan on
pages 1 and 2. It's the vision, again, of a world where for me to exist, another
creature doesn't have to die. Another animal. You just eat plants on pages 1
Jon: But without bacteria and viruses and whatever.
Tim: I'm just telling the story.
Jon: But Genesis 1 and 2 doesn't say, "Don't eat animals."
Tim: Yes, yes. It says, "I've given you every plant and seed-bearing tree."
Jon: By excluding animals from that list?
Tim: Correct. That's correct. The ideal vision is a vegan diet where you live off what
the land produces.
Jon: You got to make sure you get a whole protein out of those nuts and fruits
Tim: That's right.
Jon: Some nuts, yeah. Complete protein.
Tim: That's right. But when Noah gets recommissioned as the new humanity,
there's a provision made for eating animals. Then there's a clarification made
saying, "But not humans. Not humans." Then this is a little poetic line.
"Whoever sheds the human's blood, by humans his blood shall be shed for in
the image of God He made humanity."
Jon: I want to look this up. Genesis 9:5-6.
Jon: He says, "Don't eat humans."
Tim: No, no, no. He repeats where he gives to humans on page 1.
Jon: "God blessed Noah and his sons, saying, 'Be fruitful and increase in number
and fill the earth.'" That's repeating Genesis 2.
Jon: "The fear and dread of you will fall on all the beasts of the earth, and on all
the birds in the sky, on every creature that moves along the ground, and on
all the fish in the sea; they are given into your hands. Everything that lives and
moves about will be food for you." So this is the new thing?
Tim: Yeah. I give it all to you just as I gave you the plants.
Jon: "Just as I give you the plants, cool, now you can eat the animals." Well, I never
noticed that. Now you're off your vegan diet. "But you must not eat meat that
has its lifeblood still in it." Which is like a kosher thing, right?
Jon: "And your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting." So like—
Tim: For humans.
Jon: So if a human dies, someone's going to be held responsible.
Tim: Then you get a little palm to unpack it. Whoever sheds human blood by
human, their blood shall be shed.
Jon: I see.
Tim: Why? Why is killing an animal to eat it different than killing a human? For in
the image of God, he made humans. So animal rights activists who seek
mishpat for vulnerable animals have had a difficult time.
Jon: This isn't a great passage.
Tim: What he's saying isn't, therefore, go destroy all living creatures. That's
Jon: He does say that they will fear and dread you. Like a deer, he fears and
dreads you. But your cattle they like you. They are hanging out.
Tim: That's a good point.
Jon: Your pig becomes your friend.
Tim: I did not grow up on a farm.
Jon: Me neither. But I hear pigs are very intelligent animals.
Tim: The point is, in Genesis 9, the value of human life is seen as having a sacred
transcended dignity that a human being who takes the life of another human
is very different than squishing a praying mantis. And that you're actually
wrong in God. You're wrong God when you harm your animal. Remember
that proverb about the wise man takes care of his animal? Because that's a
part of God's creation and good world.
Jon: There's never a moment where you can kill a person for your own sustenance
or preservation but you can with an animal?
Tim: That seems to be the point here. And why is it? What's the rationale
Jon: Because of the image.
Tim: The image of God. Here's what's important is that this is a uniquely Jewish
Christian tradition, an idea that is not derived from nature.
Tim: It's also unique in the history of human civilization. You can go to the great
ethical thinkers of ancient Greece, Aristotle. His whole argument is, there are
some humans who are more valuable than others, and by nature, some
humans are meant to be slaves and be ruled by the reasonable and the
Jon: That's not even an ancient thing.
Tim: Totally. Yeah, right. All humans are created equal, except the ones who aren't
Jon: Exactly. And women.
Tim: Yes, and women. Exactly. Even societies that say that they honor the Bible
have found this a difficult vision to live up to or have just straight up not
actually been consistent. They've been inconsistent. This is a radical
contribution of the Hebrew Bible to human history is the concept of a
mishpat, a right, the inherent possession of every single human regardless
of...I mean it's page 1 of the Bible where God—
Jon: That's easy to take for granted that all humans deserve—
Tim: Yeah, that's right. In our culture, it's now easy to take for granted because of
our cultural amnesia.
Jon: But why should you care about every human the same? In reality, we don't. I
mean, I can't care as much for an orphanage full of kids in Romania as I do
care about my own kids. I just can't. Maybe that's not what we're talking
about. Because I'm not going to go and kill them.
Tim: No, I don't think that's necessarily what it's talking about. But it is saying this
is the rationale underneath all of this, mishpat and tzedakah, and it's that
human life is sacred and precious. Every single human life.
So within my community and realms of influence, under the wise
administration of my life and resources, there are going to be people,
however, whose mishpat is neglected, their image-bearing value is neglected,
and God, a follower of Jesus, who takes it seriously will try to notice that and
be a part of with whatever is at their disposal to change that for the people.
There's one other time the image of God's explicitly drawn on in the same
way in the New Testament. It's in the letter of James, where he talks about the
way we talk with people, talk to people in James chapter 3.
It's that great line where it says with the same mouth, we say, Praise God and
thank you, God for everything, and then we go and speak poorly of
somebody we don't like. He says, "With the same time we bless God, and
with it, we curse humans who have been made in the image of God." This
should not be happening.
It's the same rationale. There's actually no human who deserves to be cursed.
You can say what somebody's doing is wrong, but to slander and devalue
them and treat them as less than human, that's a violation of their dignity.
Even people that you don't like, that's a really uniquely biblical idea.
Jon: Image of God.
Tim: That's the idea where every human has a mishpat before God - A right and a
Tim: From here, then, it's kind of a familiar territory. When human beings redefine
good and evil, they take the knowledge of good and evil into their own
hands, they tend to create societies where I sought the mishpat of me and
my group at the expense of the mishpat of you and your group, and
whatever. That's just human history. That's Genesis 1 to 11.
So God singles out a family. There's a line in the Abraham stories that haven't
got the attention they deserve. It's in chapter 18. What God says about
Abraham, "Surely Abraham will become a great and mighty nation, and in
him, all the nations of the earth will be blessed. Won't they? For I have chosen
him so that he may command his children and household after him to keep
the way of the Lord by doing tzedakah and mishpat - righteousness and
justice - so that the Lord may bring upon Abraham what he's spoken about
What's the promise? That all nations will be restored to divine blessing. How?
Through this family living and among the nations but have different value
system than Egypt, or Babylon, and its righteousness and justice. Here the
definition is assumed all this broad meaning that we've talked about.
Then they experienced themselves God's own righteousness and justice when
he redeems them out of slavery in Egypt. They became the vulnerable. God
showed righteousness and justice for the oppressed on their behalf.
Therefore, He revealed to them the laws of the Torah that were embodiments
of mishpat and tzedakah to create the family of Abraham that does Mishpat
and tzedakah. And that all the nations would look and say, "Wow, what an
incredibly wise nation that does mishpat and tzedakah?" Israel doesn't do it.
Here's where the profits come into play.
Here's what I thought was interesting. When we get to the prophets in the
wisdom literature is that the prophets are pointing out all these ways that
Israelites are perpetrating injustice. And they talk about the new messianic
leader is going to come and so on. But I thought this was this quote from
Bruce Waltke. This is from his commentary on Proverbs. He's an incredible
Hebrew Bible scholar. He wrote two fat volumes on proverbs that are so legit.
The first volume begins—
Jon: This is the excitement you get about large books most of the times. You
actually show me the size of them with your hands and then your eyes kind
of glaze over and your mouth drops a little bit. It's pretty funny.
Tim: The first hundred pages it's just these really cool essays on all these biblical
vocabulary words, like wisdom, foolishness.
He has these two great essays on righteousness and justice in the book of
Proverbs. Anyway, he summarizes it with this great line. He says, "If you read
the book of Proverbs, here's what the common denominator really see about
the righteous, the tzadiyk. The righteous are those who are willing to
disadvantage themselves to the advantage of their community.
Jon: We call those suckers. Right? No.
Tim: "The wicked in proverbs, m'rusha [SP], the wicked, those are who are willing
to disadvantage the community to advantage themselves.
Jon: So funny I was really into poker for a while.
Tim: I remember that.
Jon: You remember that?
Tim: Well, I remember I was living in Wisconsin in that period.
Jon: I probably was playing a little bit when you moved back too. I don't know at
what point I stopped.
Tim: You had poker nights with your friends?
Jon: No, I would go and play tournaments.
Tim: Oh, what?
Tim: I did not know that. I just thought you would do Poker Nights.
Jon: No. Poker Nights got boring because my friends don't like to really play
poker. It just becomes a social thing, which I should care about. But what I
was really loving was just the competition, the game of poker.
In the game of poker, it's all about taking advantage of people when they
make mistakes. You have to. That's how you win. When someone makes a
mistake, you take advantage of that person, and you get some of their chips.
It's all about collecting their chips over time. It's not necessarily the cards that
you get dealt, it's about finding the opportunities to take advantage of
You can lie. It's bluffing. You're supposed to. You're supposed to pretend you
have a better hand than you do. The person who comes and doesn't know
what they're doing, you call them the fish. They are the fish. They are the
sucker. And every table, if you don't know the fish is, you are the fish.
It's always being aware of, who can I take advantage of, and how am I going
to take advantage of them. Then when people are strong, and you know it's
going to be hard to take advantage of them, then you try to find their
weaknesses. You're like, "Okay, what's this person's weakness? Do they have a
tell where you know what they might have by their body language or by their
actions? Do they have certain habit just in the way that they bend or different
things? And take advantage of that? It's so interesting. It's like the opposite of
mishpat. Is why I bring it up.
Tim: That's interesting. Do you think that that's different than any other sport?
Jon: Oh, yeah, it's very different.
Tim: Okay. It's like when you're playing basketball, you're also trying to exploit
your opponent's weaknesses and take advantage, right?
Tim: Is it different because it's just you as opposed to a team?
Jon: It is true. It's very individual. There's no teamwork.
Tim: It's usually for money as opposed to—
Jon: I don't know. There's something ruthless about it.
Tim: It feels different. I'm just trying to understand what the difference is.
Jon: Between that and basketball?
Jon: Because in basketball, you want to fool your opponent. You want them to
think you'll dribble left, and you dribble right. You want to fake them out and
realize, "Oh, they don't have a good jump shot, so I'm going to make them
have to take the jump shot. I don't know.
But for whatever reason, reading that, the righteous are those who are willing
to disadvantage themselves to the advantage of their community, if you go
into a poker room with that mentality, you're going to lose. Everyone else can
take advantage of you.
I think that's the mentality that maybe when that gets applied then to life.
Like life is the poker room and I've got to take the chips that I can, and I can't
show weakness, or I'm going to be taken advantage of. To tell someone to go
into the situation and be willing to disadvantaged yourself for the advantage
of the community is just so backwards.
Tim: Yeah, that's true. The reason why I included that is because I think this is our
ticket to the way this video works and the way it connects to Jesus. Really it's
like the perfect segue. Because Jesus comes onto the scene and he, first of all,
embodies this prophetic vision of mishpat, he's constantly moving towards
the vulnerable, and including them first within...The Gospel of Luke
intentionally turns up the volume on that part of Jesus's mission is good news
for the poor. It's mishpat for the poor.
Think of this parable where if you throw luncheon, if you're a part of the
kingdom of God, and you throw a dinner—
Jon: Don't invite people that can pay you back.
Tim: Invite the people who actually can't benefit you at all you. Which means it
actually is all for your disadvantage because you're paying for the meal. Jesus
says that's what it is.
When Jesus confronts the Pharisees in the Gospel of Luke chapter 11, he says,
"You really precise that paying a tithe, not just your produce, but love your
mint plants, you disregard justice, and the love of God." These are things you
should be doing without neglecting the others.
So justice and love are two sides of the same coin for Jesus. But we already
knew that from Mica to do, justice and love mercy in terms of looking for
those who are the vulnerable. That's the Jesus part. So it's both he embodied
that vision of mishpat in His Kingdom of God mission.
Then, the moment of the cross is precisely the moment where in Jesus, God
disadvantages himself while He also accomplishes recompense. The cross
becomes this moment the judge becomes the judged. Or you could say it's
where both definitions of justice perfectly meet together at the cross where
God brings a just recompense on human evil, but He provides that by
embodying mishpat for the poor by taking it himself.
So the cross is where God's love and justice meet together. I think that's a
really compelling, interesting and beautiful idea.
Tim: Then where you go from there since our goal was to think about response in
some way, is followers of Jesus find themselves as people who have received
this loving mishpat, where our plight of frail, mortal, morally corrupt humans
has been recognized, it's been addressed through the life, death and
resurrection of Jesus.
Jon: It's our exodus.
Tim: It's our exodus. He looked on us in our slavery to ourselves, and even deeper
mysterious evil powers that I don't claim to understand and he provided a
way forward himself. And so the people of Jesus should be at the forefront of
creating this kind of mishpat, especially for the vulnerable. You can see how
the arc goes there. So it's the image of God, every human has inherent sacred
right and value.
The way human history works, we disregard that God singled out a family. I
mean, this has the arc of many of our theme videos.
Jon: I'm wondering when these are going get tiring to people?
Tim: Yeah, I know. That's a good question. Part of it is the biblical story. We're just
trying to think about it from different angles. I thought about that as I was
Jon: Oh, did you? I don't think we're there, but it is something that came to both
our minds. That's cool.
Tim: If we can build these two senses of justice, and then the Jesus and His death
and resurrection, where both of them come together, we're God's way of
confronting evil and stopping it is also his means of showing generous
attention to the vulnerable.
Jon: The two ideas are very stitched together. Almost so much so like is it
essentially the same thing. Like does our evil always result in oppression? Is
that just a natural result? Or is there a kind of evil that wouldn't...?
Tim: Well, it's interesting. When you're talking about the Bernie Madoff example
interview, even the person at the center of all that wasn't just the
embodiment of evil. Somehow our insecurities, mistakes, even noble efforts
can all get twisted and turned into create great injustice.
Jon: Yeah, totally.
Tim: That's a part of the human condition that we need help. We need to figure
that out. Somebody needs to help us figure that out. The story of the Bible is
that Jesus is the only way out of that plight by what he did on our behalf, but
also by the new way of living that he embodied.
Jon: Here, I mean, we're talking about what he did on our behalf as an example,
but then it also in some way releases us. From whatever the draw is, whatever
that spiritual evil is that traps us in that, this video really isn't going to get
Jon: Which is interesting. Oh, you said we might do this video. It would be the the
chaos monster. That's the connecting piece to like, what's the salvation, what
am I being freed from so that now I can live a life more of righteousness and
Because I could think of how I might be able to do it without Jesus, like,
"Well, I'm just going to care more about the poor and I'm going to care more
about my consumer habits and the climate, all these different things that
might all affect things and to make my life all about that. And I don't need
Jesus in that equation." Maybe I'll be like, "Yeah, it's a cool moral example of
having done that, but what's the actual empowerment?" But that's a different
video it seems like.
Tim: Yeah, it is. I think this is mostly about painting this biblical definition of justice
as being primarily oriented towards the vulnerable, how that's rooted in the
image of God and then violated, and that God's on a mission to create a
people who live differently, and that Jesus is the one who perfectly leading
the bodies and trailblazers the way forward into that by taking the ultimate
consequences of injustice, therefore, rendering recompense on human
justice. But then also in that same act, seeking out the mishpat for the
Jon: Thanks for listening to this episode of The Bible Project podcast. We're going
to do a question and response episode next on the Biblical justice, so we
need your questions.
What you can do is you can record your question on your phone or computer
and then email it to us firstname.lastname@example.org. Try to keep the
question to, I don't know 15, 20 seconds or less. Don't forget to give us your
name and where you're from. Again, the email is
We need these questions by Wednesday, October 25th. So send them on
over and we'll get as many as we can into that next episode of the podcast.
Our video on justice is releasing next Thursday the 26th, so keep a lookout
for that. We're really proud of it. Thanks for being a part of this with us.