If you read the Gospels, what they are saying is that, in and of themselves, humans remain blind to the true nature of reality. We need the creator to pull back the veil, so to speak. And in the story of Jesus—his life, death, and resurrection—Jesus’ claim right here in Matthew 11 is that he is the one who pulls back the curtain to the nature of reality and the nature of who he is.
In part one (0:00–13:00), Tim and Jon continue their conversation on how to read apocalyptic literature. They begin by talking about the last book of the Bible, the Revelation. Most people associate the word apocalypse with the end of the world based on what they read in the Revelation.
However, many of Israel’s prophets also have apocalyptic dreams or visions about ultimate reality. Many of these prophetic books have apocalyptic sections within them.
There is also a body of Jewish meditation literature written around the same time as John’s Revelation that are called the Jewish apocalypses. Tim mentions biblical and extra-biblical apocalyptic moments, which are listed below.
Apocalypses in the Hebrew Scriptures:
Post-Biblical Jewish Apocalypses (Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha, i.e. second temple literature and later)
The word apocalypse can refer to an event, a literary style, and a moment that happens to someone. In the ancient world, apocalypses were understood not as a genre, but with a few common conventions for describing dreams and visions. Apocalyptic moments in the Hebrew Bible are linked through common language, descriptions, messages, and symbolism. These biblical apocalypses always take place within the larger context of a book of the Bible.
In part two (13:00–24:00), Tim and Jon look at New Testament examples of the word apocalypse.
“No one lights a lamp and covers it in a clay jar or puts it under a bed. Instead, they put it on a stand, so that those who come in can see the light. For there is nothing hidden that will not be visible, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into visibility.
At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this is what you were pleased to do. All things have been committed to me by my Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.
Tim says that the Gospel accounts are apocalyptic in a literal sense—they reveal the identity of Jesus. An apocalypse isn’t something we do ourselves—someone else has to show us. Our English word for this is revelation, the same translation as the title for John’s apocalypse.
Tim does a quick case study of the apostle Paul’s use of the word apocalypse.
I did not receive it from any human, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by apocalypse from Jesus Christ. For you have heard of my previous way of life in Judaism, how intensely I persecuted the church of God and tried to destroy it. I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my own age among my people and was extremely zealous for the traditions of my fathers. But when God, who set me apart from my mother’s womb and called me by his grace, was pleased to apocalypse his Son in/to me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles….
The apocalypse that Paul received was meant to be carried to others through his preaching.
In part three (24:00–end), Tim and Jon further discuss Paul’s apocalyptic moment. Luke describes this moment initially in Acts 9.
As he neared Damascus on his journey, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. He fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?” “Who are you, Lord?” Saul asked. “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting,” he replied. “Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.” The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone. Saul got up from the ground, but when he opened his eyes he could see nothing. So they led him by the hand into Damascus. For three days he was blind, and did not eat or drink anything.
When Paul looks back on this moment in the book of Galatians, he calls it an apocalypse. Paul understood his apocalypse as an experience to be passed on to others through his preaching.
Tim shares from the third time Paul tells his story in the book of Acts.
“About noon, King Agrippa, as I was on the road, I saw a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, blazing around me and my companions. We all fell to the ground, and I heard a voice saying to me in Aramaic, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’ Then I asked, ‘Who are you, Lord?’ ‘I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting,’ the Lord replied. ‘Now get up and stand on your feet. I have appeared to you to appoint you as a servant and as a witness of what you have seen and will see of me. I will rescue you from your own people and from the Gentiles. I am sending you to them to open their eyes and turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of the Satan to God, so that they may receive forgiveness of sins and a place among those who are made holy by faith in me.’ So then, King Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the vision from heaven.”
This revelation resulted in a moment of clarity for Paul. Tim and Jon then talk about moments of clarity that have happened to them. Jon shares about a moment of processing in prayer that resulted in sudden clarity, and Tim talks about getting away into nature.
In the next episode, Tim and Jon will highlight themes in the book of Revelation and then find their source in the Hebrew Scriptures. Tim calls this search, “the Jewish apocalyptic imagination.”
Show produced by Dan Gummel.
Powered and distributed by Simplecast.
Apocalyptic Letters E3 Final
Is the Gospel an Apocalypse?
Podcast Date: May 11, 2020
Speakers in the audio file:
Jon: Hey, this is Jon at the BibleProject, and we're in the middle of a series on how to read apocalyptic literature in the Bible. So far we've discussed how the word "apocalypse" doesn't mean the end of the world. Instead, an apocalypse is when something is uncovered or revealed. In the Bible, an apocalypse is a sudden confrontation with the ultimate meaning of reality.
Tim: Once something is revealed to you or you have a revelation, often results in clarity that you have to like work out. That's certainly what happened to Paul. This thing happened to him, and then it forced him to go into, what he calls in Galatians, just this period in Arabia. He went solo for a while I think to just work it all out. So like the apocalypse gave him a new angle of vision and then he had to go find clarity in light of this new vision of reality.
Jon: So, today we discuss how an apocalypse isn't something you create. Rather, it's something that happens to you. And when an apocalypse does come, it's an opportunity to rethink everything. Thanks for joining us. Here we go.
Jon: We're in our series on how to read the Bible, and we are in the genre of literature called apocalyptic literature, which you find in the Prophets. I guess we haven't really talked about this.
Tim: Yeah, that's right. Maybe we should have started by listing what parts of the Bible we're talking.
Jon: In my mind it's a lot of the prophets and the Revelation at the end.
Tim: Let's start with the Revelation. We call the Revelation the Revelation, not Revelations with an "S on the end. How did that happen?
Jon: I don't know. But that's how I grew up calling it.
Tim: Yeah, so many people call it Revelations. The opening line is "the revelation." So that phrase, "the revelation of Jesus Christ given to His servant John"—that's the opening line of last book of the Bible—that word, the "revelation" is the Greek word apocalypses or if you spell it with English letters, apocalypse. The apocalypse. It seems to be some kind of title, or heading to describe what the work is.
What's happened is people who don't understand the cultural background and the literary style have come to associate that word with what they think the book is about, which is the destruction of the world. It's the apocalypse, which means the end of the world. We're going to explore that debatable issue. But then there are other books in the Bible, where you have a prophet figure who has dreams or visions about ultimate reality: Daniel, Ezekiel, Amos, Isaiah, many of the prophets. And so those whole books aren't necessarily called apocalypses. They're called the books of the Prophets. But within the books of the Prophets, there are apocalyptic sections. That's a term that scholars often use. There you go.
Then, contemporary to the revelation of John, which was written somewhere in the second half of the 1st century AD, there is a growing body of Jewish literature that reads a lot like the book of Revelation. And so these are called the Jewish apocalypses, or Jewish apocalyptic literature. Actually, I do have a list....
Jon: Of other contemporary apocalyptic experiences.
Jon: Oh, wow.
Tim: Within the Bible, there are....
Jon: Oh, these are all the ones in the Bible?
Tim: These are all stories in which someone has an apocalyptic experience, which we talked about is a dream or vision.
Jon: That's different than literature written in an apocalyptic genre.
Tim: Kind of.
Jon: Kind of.
Tim: Scholarship and popular level use of the word "apocalypse" and "apocalyptic" is extremely confused and muddy.
Tim: Because it can refer to an event, which unpopularly standing is the end of the world. It can refer to a literary style.
Jon: And that's what we're talking about, the literary style.
Tim: Yeah, correct.
Tim: And it can also refer to a an event that happens to someone in a narrative when they have a dream or vision.
Jon: And so far we've just been talking about the word and what it means. In the last episode, we just talked about how the word "apocalyptic" means "to unveil" or "to uncover." And it doesn't necessarily mean for something to be destroyed.
Tim: Yeah, or to describe the end of something.
Jon: End of something. That's a modern construct. But that's talking about apocalypse as it's just a word. And we talked about stories where people experience uncovering of sorts. Jacob in the stairway to heaven.
Tim: What their experience is, is described with the biblical vocabulary of apocalypse. Either the Hebrew word, which is gala, or the New Testament Greek word, which is apocalypto.
Jon: And you've got a whole list here of those kind of situations.
Tim: Let's see. Yeah, about 15 stories. Some of them are Isaiah's vision of Yahweh in Jerusalem in the temple, where a coal burns his lips. Or Ezekiel famously in Babylon sees the divine throne mobile, and the vision of the new temple and so on. Daniel's visions of beasts and divine thrones and so on. But there's also most famous biblical prophets have moments where they have dreams or visions, and it's an unveiling or revealing of God. Abraham has many apocalypses where God appears to him—is uncovered.
Jon: Like just talking to him?
Tim: Yeah, yeah, totally. Or where Abraham falls asleep, and has a dream and a vision of God as a smoking fire talking to him and so on. What you could say is these are stories about apocalypses in the Bible.
Jon: Is it fair to say then, when the Bible describes the experience of the apocalypse, then they're writing in the genre of apocalyptic literature?
Tim: Yeah. In other words, there actually wasn't a category...like if we go down to Powell's bookstore, bookstore in Portland, we go, "Do I go to poetry? Do I go to here? Let me go to the apocalyptic section." There was no apocalyptic section in ancient Judaism. When you describe a moment when somebody has a dream or a vision and they see the true nature of reality or God's purposes or what's going on, there is a typical mode in which they describe that dream or vision.
Jon: A mode.
Tim: And that way of describing the content of the dream or the vision is what we use the word apocalyptic to refer to. And so, it just so happens the Bible, Christian Bible ends with a whole book that unpacks the apocalyptic experience of a guy named John of Patmos.
Jon: So, we're talking about it as a genre of literature, and you described it as a mode of writing. Which is?
Tim: Literary style. Jon: A literary style. Tim: Yeah, that's right.
Jon: But you're saying if you would have gone to talk to an ancient Israelite, and you're like, "Oh, you're writing in this literary style," they would kind of be like, "Well, no, I'm just..."
Tim: Well, no. I think what they would say is, "Well, when I'm recounting the dream or a vision of an important Prophet or figure, here's how you do it."
Jon: "Here's how you do it."
Tim: "Here's how you represent a dream or a vision in a literary style. Here's how we do it."
Jon: Okay, got it.
Tim: Just like there's a way that you write an editorial for a newspaper. There's a way you write a blog post or a short essay. You get into a certain mode. I mean this mode of this kind of literature. In the same way, when biblical authors represent somebody dreams, they are fitting into the pattern, a conventional way of doing it.
Jon: Yeah, that makes sense. We don't really have a corollary to that in like when we write down our dreams,. Like if you dream journal, I think are just trying to write exactly what you experienced. There's no like convention for how to do it necessarily.
Jon: But you're saying, for an ancient Israel, there was a mode a convention for how you depict these kind of experiences.
Tim: Yeah. In a way these apocalyptic moments are a design pattern that unfolds and develops throughout the story of the Bible. Because they're all hyperlinked. When people have these dreams and visions within the Hebrew Bible, they're all experiencing variations of the same thing. And it develops as the Bible goes on. And it usually involves what feels and looks and is described like a temple. And there encountering a superhuman figure on a throne, if they can even look at this figure because they're glowing so brightly. And they're usually given insight into what's happening around them, and then given a message of some kind to share. That's what all of these have in common.
And there's a heavy use of symbolic imagery. So that's what characterizes this. But there are different people having these experiences in different stories and moments. So what they're about will always be a little bit different, but there's some basic shared elements. And so it raises the question, like, these people, I think, actually had these experiences, so it's fascinating that they keep seeing and encountering some of the same things. So it doesn't seem to be just a reflection of their internal psyche, but these people actually encountered someone.
I'm fine calling this how to read apocalyptic literature as long as we have this kind of footnote to that meaning. Sometimes the apocalypse is a whole book, like the last book of the Bible. But that's the only case like that in the Bible. Every other apocalypse in the Bible is in a narrative setting within some larger work. The book of a Prophet or...
Jon: Or arguably, the Revelation isn't entirely apocalypse.
Tim: And that's true.
Jon: It's a letter.
Tim: It's also a letter. It's an apocalyptic prophetic letter. But anyhow. There's a lot of apocalyptic moments in the Bible. In the time of Revelation, it does seem like those narratives in the Bible have given birth to a certain form of a book. The Revelation is one of them. There's a lot of other...scholars call them the Jewish apocalypses. They go by different names. First Enoch, Second Baruch, Fourth Ezra, the Apocalypse of Abraham. But these are mostly modern titles to refer to these works.
But they're about these bubbles figures. They're written long after the life of any of these people, Enoch and Baruch. But it's an author imagining the dream or vision they had as through the eyes and experience of a biblical character. Anyway, they're actually really fascinating to read. But that's another matter. That's what we're talking about when we say apocalyptic literature.
Jon: What's unique about the Revelation in this list is, if all the other ones are kind of imaginings, this one is what this guy, John experience.
Tim: Another way to say that is, the most typical mode in the period of the Second Temple, if the Jewish author was going to write in this apocalyptic mode, they would use a biblical character and turn that book into the author, so to speak. So Baruch, the scribe of Jeremiah, becomes like a mantle that the author puts on to the experience the vision through their eyes. But the book is written for the author's own day and audience. In other words, they expect that the reader will know like, "This didn't actually come from Baruch." But it's representing the message of the prophets as if it came from Baruch and so on. And so the Revelation to John of Patmos in the New Testament sticks out. It's the only Jewish apocalypse.
Jon: And he doesn't put on this persona to experience it through. It's just him experiencing it.
Tim: Totally. Yeah, it sticks out among all the apocalypses, which is really interesting. The name for that feature is called pseudepigrapha, which is a Greek compound word meaning false name—you write in the name of someone else. And so John is the only apocalypse that doesn't use the pseudepigraph feature. False name feature. Those are little tidbits.
Jon: All right.
Tim: We looked at vocabulary for apocalypse in the Old Testament, and how that helps us understand the meaning. It's about peeling back the curtain, seeing the true nature of reality. Let's look at some new testament examples. We'll kind of fill out this picture. And this is great because when you're in the New Testament, you can actually just get out the concordance and look for the word "apocalypto". I'll let you read a famous parable of Jesus from Luke chapter 8.
Jon: Okay. Luke 8:16-17. "No one lights a lamp and covers it in the clay jar and puts it under a bed. Instead, they put it on a stand, so that those who come in can see the light. For there's nothing hidden that will not be visible, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into visibility."
Tim: The whole point of the parable is about something covered and then something being exposed. What's interesting, the Greek word apocalypto is a compound word. "Apo" means "from" or "away from." "Calypto" means "to cover" or "to conceal." So if you take the "apo" off, you get the Greek word calypto, which is what Jesus says, "If you calypto a lamp..."
Jon: If you cover a lamp.
Tim: Mm hmm. The opposite of apocalypse is a calypse, which means to cover.
Jon: This works in English. Cover or uncover.
Tim: Oh, yeah, that's right. Cover or uncover. Calypto, apocalypto. That's it. Yeah, that's it. Now, what's fascinating, Jesus uses the word "calypto" for covering the lamp, but when He describes the opposite, He doesn't use the Greek word "apocalypto." He uses a synonym phaneroo which means to become seeable. And so these two words then, apocalypse and a phanerosis, become synonyms of the same thing. Apocalypto means to uncover...
Jon: When you uncover something it becomes visible.
Tim: When you uncover something it becomes phaneroo—visible or seeable. Here's another example in the teachings of Jesus. This is at the end of Matthew 11:25. "At that time, Jesus said, 'I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven on earth, for you have hidden...'" That's the Greek word crypto.
Tim: Yeah, cryptic. "You've hidden these things from the wise and the learned and you have apocalypsed them to little children. Yes, you are pleased to do this. Everything has been committed to be by my Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son. And those to whom the Son chooses to apocalypse him." So, Jesus' true identity is an apocalypse to a close circle of people around him. The disciples had an apocalypse as they slowly came to understand who Jesus really was.
I like the use of the word because it's the actual word Jesus uses here. The gospels are apocalyptic. Not in the sense that they're about the end of the world, they're about the revealing of Jesus's true identity. Isn't it interesting to think about it that way?
Jon: It is interesting. It's about understanding the true nature of something. To be exposed to the true nature of something so that you can see it for what it really is, is an apocalypse. Do we have a word? When you see something as it really is, the true nature of something, you are enlightened.
Tim: We use intellectual perception vocabulary. You understand, you have insight, you are perceptive. A perceptive person is somebody who can see. Oh, but it's different because if you're perceptive, it's you. It's you are understanding it and seeing it for yourself.
Jon: Versus it showing itself to you.
Tim: When you have an apocalypse, like Jesus just said, this is something that's hidden. Jesus' true identity is hidden, and you have to actually get to know Him and start following Him to have His identity apocalypsed for you. Somebody else has to show it to you. You can't see it yourself. dude, this is so interesting.
If you read the Gospels, what they're saying is that in and of themselves, humans remain blind to the true nature of reality. We need the creator to pull back the veil, so to speak. And in the story of Jesus, His life, death, and resurrection, Jesus' claim right here in Matthew 11 is that He is the one who pulls back the curtain to the nature of reality and the nature of who He is. And unless you undergo that apocalypse, you won't understand Him or yourself or the world.
Jon: We have a lot of words for when we are trying to pull back the veil. Enlightened, illuminated, perceptive. But there's no English word similar to when the divine or, you know, if you don't believe in God, that you like the cosmos unveiling itself to you, what's that word?
Tim: Man, so interesting. Well, I guess it depends on your social location. If you have grown up within or have a completely materialist worldview, there is no greater purpose.
Jon: You know what we call that? Sorry. Tim: What?
Tim: Oh, yeah. "I had a revelation." Jon: "I had a revelation."
Tim: We use it as something that happened to you.
Jon: Happened to you.
Tim: Oh, that's good.
Jon: What is interesting is that's the translation of apocalypse.
Tim: Yeah, the Greek word apocalypse. The revelation, which is the noun of the verb "reveal."
Jon: Yes. "It was revealed to me. I had a revelation, an epiphany."
Tim: In English you can say, "I had a revelation," which, depending on who you're talking to, could mean "I had an idea." But what you're describing is "I feel like the idea happened to me."
Jon: "The idea happened to me."
Jon: We know what that feels like.
Tim: Totally. That's exactly right. This is why, we've talked about this before, especially in ancient Greek culture, poets were called the muses. And that word "muse" means to be a channel of the gods communication. Because that a good poet writes about things in a way that put you in touch with ultimate truth, what feels like ultimate meaning, and so their poetry becomes a kind of apocalypse, a revelation of the divine realm to little old me reading this poem or something. Yeah, revelation.
Jon: What's funny is, calling the book of Revelation, I never think of it in terms of the English term having a revelation.
Tim: That's interesting.
Jon: For whatever reason, it took on a life of its own. But thinking of it in that terms is really helpful because we don't use the word apocalypse. I mean, I could try to start using it. But revelation.
Tim: Revelation. That's it. You had a revelation. I think, pretty close.
Jon: It's pretty close. It's a very personal one...
Tim: I think why I like using the Greek word apocalypse is it kind of just jars you and it forces you to start redefining the word in terms of its actual meaning.
Jon: Well, help me with how you use it, though. "I had an apocalypse"?
Tim: I think it's "I had an apocalypse" or it wasn't a...
Jon: That was an apocalypse.
Tim: Or it was an apocalyptic moment or this is a story of an apocalypse. In other words, it's a revelation that somebody has.
Tim: I want to just take a quick case study of Paul the apostle and how he uses this word. This is pretty significant.
Tim: Paul uses the vocabulary of apocalypto, apocalypses quite a bit in his letters. For example, in the opening chapter of his letter to the Galatians, he talks about how the good news that he goes around announcing. Verse 12, "I didn't receive it from any human. Rather," he says, "I received it by apocalypse from Jesus the Messiah." What he's saying is the core message he's announcing wasn't because he decided to have a cup of coffee with Peter or James in Jerusalem. Something happened to him that he calls an apocalypse that's at the root of why he's doing what he's doing.
Jon: It wasn't Peter who uncovered it for him. Tim: Right.
Jon: It was Jesus Himself who uncovered it.
Tim: Jesus happened to him. And that happening to him was a revelation that changed his life and worldview. Everything. Now, he goes on, he says, "Because listen, you Galatians you know of my previous way of life in the family of Judah..."
Jon: Who's a known quantity here.
Tim: "I persecuted the church of God. I was trying to destroy it. You guys know that was what I was doing." In fact, he says, "I was advancing beyond anyone in my own age so zealous for the traditions of my fathers." So there's my pre-apocalyptic Paul. And then he says, "But," verse 15, "when God, who set me apart from my mother's womb...God was at work before I even know. He says, "He called me by His grace, and He was pleased to apocalypse..." It's a verb. "...he was pleased to apocalypse His Son..." And then he uses the phrase "in me, so that I might announce Him among the nations."
This phrase, "God was pleased to reveal His Son," some people think it means "to me," but it is a Greek word for "in". It's fascinating. So the question is, is that he referring to the thing he just described earlier, that he had an apocalypse of Jesus and God was pleased to reveal Jesus to him? Or is he saying, 'now that I had an apocalypse of Jesus, God was pleased so that Jesus might be apocalypse in me to others'? Because he goes on to say, "So that I could announce Him among the nations."
Jon: Others are experiencing Jesus through him.
Tim: Yeah. The Apocalypse that he had is now the thing that he is to help other people have, which is to have apocalyptic encounter by seeing who Jesus really is. Interesting use of the vocabulary. Apocalypse. I like this.
Jon: "I received it by an apocalypse of Jesus." So Jesus—and this is the Christ, This is post-resurrection not the disciples walking around with Jesus.
Tim: The risen Jesus.
Jon: The risen Jesus. And we have a story of this happening where it is an intense moment for Paul.
Tim: Yeah. Just pause real quick and think about that. He seems to be describing here what Luke has given us in the book of Acts, which is the story of Paul's apocalypse of Jesus on the road to Damascus. What's interesting is the word apocalypse isn't used in that story in the book of Acts. In Acts chapter 9, what Luke says, how he narrates it is Paul was nearing Damascus on the road, and a light from the skies flashed around him and he fell to the ground and heard a voice.
Jon: Probably how mantis shrimp see the sky.
Tim: "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?" And Saul asked, "Who is that? Who is that? Who are you?" "I am Yeshua, the one that you're persecuting. Get up, Saul go into the city. You'll be told what to do." Notice Saul gets up. And then it says, "He opened his eyes and he couldn't see anything." He was blind for three days. Great inversion of...because usually when you have an apocalypse, you're able to see.
Jon: You can see more.
Tim: Yes. And he is seeing more. Physically...
Jon: But through his physical eyes.
Tim: Yes, totally. Isn't that interesting?
Jon: That is interesting. Then, back to our conversation in the last episode, which is our awareness of ourselves in the world gets in the way of what actually is going on.
Tim: That's right. It's as if his blindness is about closing down his previous way of seeing. And there's going to be a whole new way of seeing that's going to open up for him. And these three days are like this period of waiting as the undergoes this transformation. What's great is it's a story about an apocalypse, but it doesn't use the word. But when Paul in the letter to the Galatians reflects back on it, he calls that moment...
Jon: An apocalypse.
Tim: An apocalypse, yeah.
Jon: And then he says, "I received the apocalypse. It happened to me." And then he goes on to say, "God is pleased to reveal Jesus in me so that I could preach among the Gentiles." Now he's saying, "That same revealing happens through my life as I go and I tell people about Jesus."
Tim: Yes. Okay. You want to see something interesting? Let's go back to the book of Acts. Paul actually tells the story of his apocalypse. It's found three times in the book of Acts. Never identical. Always the details are just a little bit different. The third time is when he's standing on trial before King Agrippa. This is in Acts 26. He starts telling Agrippa about what happened. This is in verse 13 of chapter 26. He says, "King Agrippa, I was on the road and I saw a light from the heavens brighter than the sun blazing around to me." You're like, "Oh, yeah, I remember that detail." He includes that he had some people with him. "I had some companions. We all fell to the ground." And he says, "I heard a voice speaking to me in Aramaic."
Jon: New detail?
Tim: Yeah. "Shaul, Shaul, why do you persecute me?" It's hard for you to kick against the goads. It's so interesting.
Jon: I have no idea what that means.
Tim: You know what a goad is?
Jon: No. When you goad someone, oh, it's you're prodding? It's a prod?
Tim: Yeah. It's what a farmer or herdsmen uses. It's basically a staff with a sharp pointy spear on the end. And you use it to jab an animal to get it to move forward.
Tim: So Saul is like a stubborn ox, who instead of letting the goad motivate him, he's pressing his body into it.
Jon: Got it.
Tim: It's what Saul is like. It's a vivid image.
Jon: It's what my 5-year-old is like.
Tim: Verse 16, Jesus says to Saul, "Now get up, stand on your feet. I have appeared to you, I've become visible to you to appoint you as a servant and witness of what you've seen and will see. I will rescue you from your own people and from the nations." And then look at this. "I'm sending you to them to open their eyes, to turn them from darkness to light and from the power of the Satan to God, so that they may receive forgiveness of sins and a place among those who are made holy by faith in me. So, King Agrippa, I was not disobedient to this vision from the skies." Again, you were just summarizing Paul says, 'I had an apocalypse' and now God wants...
Jon: And this is what he's telling Agrippa?
Tim: Exactly. Again, without the vocabulary, but with the idea. Jon: I see.
Tim: The thing that he underwent is now what he wants other people to undergo. It's the language of seeing, which is crucially important in apocalyptic stories...
Jon: What you see?
Tim: ...and the book of Revelation. It's about what he saw in his dreams and his visions.
Jon: And what he hears a little bit
Tim: And what he hears. That's right. But the whole thing is that apocalypses are moments where you see truly. You see things for what they really are. Which goes back to our previous episode of the conversation, kind of bring you to around full story.
Jon: I think another way we say that is a moment of clarity. I'm trying to think of...
Tim: When you say, "I have clarity," it means "I was able to get there."
Jon: Yeah, that's more of I was able to get there. But there is a sense of we all have this experience where you're just suddenly it happens to you, you're like, "Oh, I thought this is was what was going on, and now I can see something else is going on." That also is a bit of a moment of clarity that happens to you.
Tim: Once something's revealed to you or you have a revelation, often results in clarity that you have to like work out. I think that's certainly what happened to Paul. This thing happened to him, and then it forced him to go into, what he calls in Galatians, just this period in Arabia. He went solo for a while I think to just work it all out. So, like the apocalypse gave him a new angle of vision, and then he had to go find clarity, like work it all out in light of this new vision of reality.
Jon: You know, maybe it's reminded me of...I think, one of the more intimate spiritual moments I've had—I don't have a lot of times in my life where I feel like I'm talking to God or God's talking to me. But there's been a few. One was, I remember very clearly, on a drive. I was by myself in a car for a couple of hours, and so I decided to try to pray, but like in a way of processing years of stuff that had been going on. Like out loud in prayer. And I was getting through kind of the whole story, and suddenly, I understood the story in a new way. And it felt like God was giving me that clarity. And that is that moment of like, "Oh, that's what was going on.
Tim: You're saying you experienced that as almost coming from outside yourself?
Jon: It felt like it's coming from outside myself.
Tim: Being given to you.
Jon: Because I have my interpretation of this happened, and then this happened, and this was frustrating, this and this. And I'm like, I'm telling myself and God the whole story of couple years of things. And towards the end, all of a sudden, I realize the way I'm thinking about things wasn't completely cracked. Here's an insight that then unraveled and repackaged everything that felt really true. And that feels like an apocalypse of sorts.
Tim: Yeah, totally. That is very similar in what the word apocalypse means in the Bible. And I resonate with that. I have not had many of these moments. And I think the whole point of this is, even in the Bible, these moments are rare. They only happen to some people.
Jon: Well, yeah, I'm not trying to say I'm having a biblical apocalypse in the sense of like the skies were opened, I saw visions, whatever.
Tim: That's right.
Jon: In the very mundane sense of revelation but from outside of myself.
Tim: But you're making an analogy of where something felt like it came to you from God, from outside your own way of thinking about things.
Tim: I think that's exactly right. I'm with you. I've never had an experience like that. I find that is why I'm drawn more and more, as years go by, to get out into the woods, in the wilderness, go backpacking. I thought about this, because it was revealed to me, I don't know. When I'm out in the middle of nowhere, all of the human-made construction, all of the humanly fabricated reality because we live in the city where this all fabricated literally...
Jon: Yeah, there's no straight lines in nature.
Tim: So, to be an environment where I'm clearly the outsider in a way because we didn't generate any of this, I'm just out there, that's where I have really powerful moments. I'm thinking of one in particular where we're up in the Tetons in Wyoming, and we're up at this place called Iceberg Lake. Oh, my gosh, it's just so intense. The scenery is so intense. It's like you're in the Alps.
We went up to this really high ridge to get a viewpoint of almost the whole park. And then we went down and I kind of let the group go down and I went down by myself. And I was having a moment where it was like...I don't even know how to describe it except there are moments where it's difficult for me to believe in God and the whole biblical worldview and there are some moments where it feels like second nature. And that was one of those moments where I was just like, "This whole thing is a work of art. It was just the beauty." And the scope of it was overwhelming to me. But again, I didn't...
Jon: It revealed itself to you.
Tim: Yeah. But I didn't hear or see anything like in the biblical apocalypses, but I was tuning into something, I feel like. Tuning in to the true nature of reality in a way that's hard for me to see in my day to day life. And those moments are a gift. They increase my faith. That something similar to what these moments are like.
Here's what I'd like us to go next. As you start to read into the stories about apocalypses and then apocalyptic literature, like the book of Revelation, you're going to notice key motifs, ideas, repeated themes. What I want to do is talk about why the apocalypses are the way they are. We'll actually go to the book of Revelation, we'll point some things out. And then what I want to do is go back and build up from the Hebrew Bible what is all of this, all of this visionary literature with divine thrones in the skies.
Jon: So we're going to get into the meat-and-potatoes of how do you actually read? When people are describing their dreams and visions, they're talking about the universe being unveiled to them by God. The way that they describe it actually has a mode, a genre...
Tim: Yeah, a set of common images, themes, ideas.
Jon: Set of common images, themes, ideas. So we want to jump into what those are.
Tim: You could say we want to explore the Jewish apocalyptic imagination. When the biblical authors, who are all ancient Israelites and Jews, have these dreams and experiences, they tend to describe them in a typical way, and they tend to see a lot of the same things. What is all that? Why the divine thrones and heavens and angels circling the throne and beasts?
Jon: And why all the blood and all the locusts in there?
Tim: Totally. The ratcheted-up cosmic scenes of disintegration and collapse and so on, what is this all about?
Tim: And because this is what makes, especially the book of Revelation so powerful to the people who read it or hear it, is you walk away really disturbed, inspired, and with imagination full of imagery. Beasts and monsters, and dragons, and harlots, and divine thrones, and hybrid animals and blood, massive amounts of blood spilled on the ground and battles, and wars. What's this all about? All of it has its roots in the storyline of the Hebrew Bible and the basic view of the universe found there. That's what we're going to be looking at.
Jon: Thank you for listening to this episode of the BibleProject podcast. Next week, the book of Revelation. It was written by a guy named John, who was on an island called Patmos.
Tim: His body, so to speak, is on an island. But then verse 10, he says, "But I was in spirit," or we might say he's in an altered state of consciousness. That's when these moments often happen. Like for Daniel, it's he's been fasting and praying.
Jon: We're going to do a question and response episode on how to read apocalyptic literature. So if you have a question, you can submit it to us. Send it to email@example.com. We'd love to hear from you. Let us know your name, where you're from, and try to keep your question to about 20 seconds or so.
Today's show was produced by Dan Gummel. Our theme music is from the band Tents. BibleProject is a crowdfunded nonprofit in Portland, Oregon. We make videos and other free resources that show that the Bible is a unified story that leads to Jesus. You can find everything, that we've made, for free because it's already been paid for by people like you. It's at bibleproject.com Thanks for being a part of this with us.
My name is River.
My name is Claire.
What's your favorite video in the BibleProject?
I think it's when God talks about the mustard seed and how it grows into a huge tree thing.
Yeah, it's like where God says there's little mustard seed and that's how my dead stuffs, how I'm going to die and then I'm going to spring to huge thing or something.
How did you first find out about the BibleProject?
Oh, that was a long time ago. I don't even remember. I don't know. Mom, I guess.
We believe the Bible is a unified story that leads to Jesus. We're a crowdfunded project by people like me. Find free videos, study notes, podcasts, and more at the bibleproject.com.