This is our last episode in our Exile series.
This is our last episode in our Exile series. In part one (0-9:50), Tim and Jon summarize the conversation. Tim shares an insightful quote from C.S Lewis found in the Weight of Glory. Lewis believed that un-fillable human longings are a clue that there is another future reality that will one day be realized.
In part two (9:50-14:50), the guys discuss the differences between “home” and “Home.” “Home” is the ultimate paradise of humanity. Man is at “Home” in all aspects. Tim says that ancient Israel called on the nostalgia of their past kings of Solomon and David to give vocabulary for what a future kingdom ruled by God will look like.
In part three (14:50-26:10), Tim and Jon discuss how today people are considered exiles in time. Christians should consider themselves exiles of an age. Christians are loyal to the kingdom of God and King Jesus. But they currently live in an age where Christ’s kingship is not always recognized.
Tim says the ultimate story of the cross is that God is willing to take the consequences of humanity’s creation of “babylon” upon himself in order to create a world where all can be at “Home.”
In part four (26:10-end), Tim revisits how the ethic of the wisdom warrior leads a person to a constant state of “radical doubt”. Christians should be grateful for and enjoy their lives. But their ultimate hope is in God re-creating the physical world as a “Home” for all who choose to abide in him.
Thank you to all our supporters!
We're doing a Q+R on Exile! Do you have a question on the biblical theme of exile? Send it to us! info@jointhebibleproject.com
Show Resources:
"The Weight of Glory" by C.S Lewis
"The Religion of the Landless" by Daniel Smith Christopher
"A Biblical Theology of Exile" by Daniel Smith Christopher
Link to Exile video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSua9_WhQFE
Show Music:
Defender Instrumental by Rosasharn Music; I Know The Way Home by Andrew Garlucki; The First Day by Tell The Story; At Humanities Core is the Need for Grace by Tell The Story; Restless by Tell The Story
Show Produced By:
Dan Gummel, Jon Collins, Matthew Halbert Howen
Podcast Date: March 12, 2018
(31:38)
Speakers in the audio file:
Jon Collins
Tim Mackie
Man
Jon: Hey, this is Jon at The Bible Project. We've spent the last five weeks on this podcast
talking about the biblical theme of exile.
Tim: The exile of the Judeans to Babylon 586BC, it's what all of us woke up thinking about
this morning.
Jon: So this week, we're going to bring it all together, we're going to finish this
conversation. Imagine being away from home for a long time. Maybe you're a
soldier, an expert or just some sort of wanderer and many years have gone by, and
you think back to the good things that made home what it was. You begin to get
this nostalgia for home that grows and grows.
Now imagine after all this time, decades have passed, and you get to go back home.
You arrive and you find, as great as home is, it's not as wonderful as you
remembered.
Tim: The story of exile in the Bible is of God's people coming back to the land promise to
them. But the way that it's ruled and the way that they live on it is now, "this is our
home, but it's not being run like our home, it's not being run by the values of God's
kingdom."
Jon: The ancient Israelites were stuck in Babylon homesick for the good old days of King
David and King Solomon. And when they got to go back home, they found it was
nothing like they had remembered, but they held on to their nostalgia as a taste for
something good yet to come. Like them, we're homesick too. We have a nostalgia
for things we haven't even fully experienced. Our desire is, well...
Tim: A desire for home because it's a desire for something that has actually never
appeared in our experience.
[00:02:15]
Jon: Thanks for joining us today as we finish up our conversation on the exile. Here we
go.
Tim: You want to try and summarize it all?
Jon: Well, let me try it in a way we haven't summarized it.
Tim: Okay.
Jon: You know, that feeling that while this is our home, this is our family, these are our
friends, this is my job, this is my existence, it doesn't feel right. Something's missing.
Something's incomplete. I'm home, but I feel like a stranger in my own existence.
I think a lot of people can identify with that - what we've been calling the existential
angst. What is that? Why is that? Well, here's how the Bible talks about it.
The Bible talks about humanity, having a home that wouldn't create that angst -
where things are good, where relationships are right, where there's a connection
with the divine, with God, where you're not trying to figure out what's good and bad
on your own. You actually are doing this in this relationship with the power that's
greater than you and that's wiser than you and it leads to abundance and peace.
That's actually what we're craving and that's what the Garden of Eden was. And that
was lost. So the first story of the Bible is really about how we are strangers in our
own land. We've been banished from what is truly good, and now we're just kind of
aching for it.
Tim: Sorry, I hate to interrupt you when you are summarizing, but it reminded me of the
C.S. Lewis quote that captures precisely what you're getting at - the existential angst.
Jon: Okay.
Tim: It's in "The Weight of Glory," which is a whole essay that he wrote about how our
existential longings are pointers to not projections that we're just fantasizing about
and projecting up into the sky, but that they're real. He calls it the inconsolable
logging. Do you know about this passage?
Jon: I might be familiar with it.
Tim: It's from "The Weight of Glory."
Jon: Is the one like eating mud pies kind of thing?
Tim: No, it's different. But that is also in "The Weight of Glory." He calls it a desire for a
far-off country. That's why I'm thinking of it. A desire for home.
He says, "In speaking of this desire for our own far-off country that we find in
ourselves, even now, I feel a certain shyness. I'm almost committed indecency trying
to name it. I'm trying to rip open the inconsolable secret and each one of us. It's a
secret that hurts so much that we take revenge on it by calling it names like
nostalgia or romanticism or remembering our adolescence.
It's a secret that pierces with such sweetness that when in very intimate
conversation, the mention of it becomes imminent, and we grow awkward and we
try to laugh at ourselves. It's a secret we cannot hide; a secret we cannot tell that we
desire to do both.
We can't tell about it because it's a desire for something that has actually never
appeared in our experience. We can't hide it because our life experiences are
constantly suggesting this longing and we betray ourselves like lovers at the
mention at of the name.
Some call it beauty, our experience of beauty, and act as if that settled the matter.
But this is a cheat. If we could go back to those moments in the past, we would find
not the thing itself, but only the reminder of it. And what we remembered
experiencing would turn out itself to be only a remembering." Here we go. It's
getting better. It's already really good.
He says, "The books or the music in which we thought our experience of beauty was
located, these will betray us if we trust it to them. The beauty was never in them.
Rather, it came through them. And what came through them was the longing. These
things, like beauty, nostalgia, the memory of our past are only images of what we
really desire. But if we mistake them for the thing itself, they turn into dumb idols,
breaking the hearts of their worshipers.
They are not the thing itself. They are only the scent of a flower we have not yet
found, the echo of a tune we have not yet heard, and news from a country we have
not yet visited." He opens and closes with these far off land. So beautiful.
So his point...I don't even need say it. Do I need to summarize?
Jon: No. It's the longing.
Tim: It's the longing.
Jon: His point is, don't make that longing an idol to where you are now just trying to seek
the things that stirred up that longing. You're now trying to seek those as the end.
Tim: In a way, that's an interesting way to think about Babylon. It's a way of securing and
trying to make material and normal the thing...transcendence.
Jon: I think Portland's actually pretty good at that, right?
Tim: Yeah. Actually, many cities are. They because playgrounds and distractions for...Yeah,
that's true.
Jon: You think gardening is blissful and complete some logging in your soul, "Let's
double down and make everyone's front yard a garden."
Tim: And a chicken farm.
Jon: And that will solve it. I guess what C.S. Lewis is saying is, "Well, that feeling you got
while gardening, that was an echo of a tune we haven't yet heard. So enjoy it and let
it point you towards this thing."
Tim: But don't mistake it for home.
Jon: But don't mistake it for home while you do it. Participate in it and appreciate it.
Tim: It's almost like the analog of loyalty and subversion. I appreciate it...
Jon: But I am not going to worship it.
Tim: ...but I don't mistake it for the meaning of my life.
Jon: Right.
Tim: So in the same way, we are called to love God and love neighbor, and we might
come up with a really great system or way of organizing a neighborhood or a
country, that fosters that, but inevitably, it will have brokenness and selfishness built
into it. And the idolatry is to name this particular solution as the divine answer.
Jon: It's kind of why the Jewish festivals, Sukkot it's like, "Hey, we love our home, but
once a year for a week, live outside of it. Like we don't have a home because let's not
mistake this as our real home."
Tim: Yeah, it's very similar.
[00:10:02]
Jon: So getting back to the Garden of Eden thing, the Garden of Eden is saying, if we
could put a name to the tune we have not heard, if we could put a name to this
flower that...what is he say?
Tim: The scent of a flower we have not yet found.
Jon: Yeah, the scent of a flower we have not yet found. If that has a name and a picture,
the biblical picture is of Eden. Which is a very simple, yet not very concrete picture. I
mean, there's not a lot there.
Tim: Let's just have this amazing garden.
Jon: It's amazing garden. It's got four rivers.
Tim: If you believe in a beautiful mind and heart out of which the universe sprang that
being wants to be in very close intimate connecting with you—
Jon: It's the place where you can be incomplete.
Tim: Which means to know that you belong in this world, and that you're welcome here
and that you're loved and have a role and a purpose. I think it's what it means to
believe in the Christian God is to believe all those things. That's Eden. It's Home.
Jon: So what we're talking about is Home with a capital H?
Tim: That's right. Yes.
Jon: And what we have is echoes of that that are very tangible? It's so funny, you'd be
reminded of something you've never experienced. That's the whole thing's Lewis is
riffing off of there.
Tim: That's right.
Jon: and that's the reality is we're constantly being reminded of this state of being that
we've never experienced but somehow we long for. It's capital H Home.
Tim: And we get glimpses, real glimpses of through life experiences that make us want
more of that. And they give us peace.
Jon: That's the image of Genesis. But then you've got the story of Israel. In the story of
Israel, is a man named Abraham who was called by God to make a family that lives
by such an ethic that they can recreate that reality.
Tim: Or at least experience more. Experience it within their families more.
Jon: Experience it within their family and then take it outside of their family that the
nations can experience it to find that sweetness. What did he say? "Pierced with such
sweetness." That's such a good line.
Tim: Yeah.
Jon: And so Abraham's called to do that. Along with that is this promise that he'll have a
place to call Home because he was a wanderer. He didn't have a homeland. That
becomes the promised land which now the people of Israel, who eventually
inhabit...The descendants of Abraham inhabiting the promised land, they see that as
this image of Eden - this abstraction of what Eden represents.
Tim: More as a reverse. The concrete example.
Jon: Yeah, the concrete example of this Eden abstraction. It makes sense because that's
what God was calling Israel to create. But they're banished from it because they're
not creating it with. They are creating Babylon within it.
So their banishment from Israel makes them exiles in a foreign country in Babylon.
Now they're looking at this biblical story of Adam and Eve being banished from the
garden, and they're saying, "Yeah, that's our story being banished from the good."
But while the Garden of Eden actually was good, Israel, never actually attained that.
They were called to it but they never actually attained it.
Tim: And they turn two stories from their past—
Jon: The nostalgia.
Tim: The nostalgia of the eras of David and Solomon as the closest experiences they can
think of.
Jon: An echo of the tune. Which is what they have.
Tim: Yeah. Which is why the hope for age of the kingdom of God is described as the
reign of not even a new David. Ezekiel just calls them Messiah and the kingdom of
God. He calls them Messiah David. Just David.
Jon: Let's get him back in charge.
Tim: That's exactly it. And what they don't mean is, let's time warp historical David. What
they mean is the ultimate home that David represents in their hope and in their
scriptures is what they want.
Jon: David is the scent of the flower they have not seen. But it's what they have.
Tim: Yeah, that's right.
[00:15:26]
Jon: But then they come back to the land. So they're now in the land that's supposed to
be Home, Capital H Home, the thing itself, and it's not yet. So because of that,
there's still the sense of "We're still exiles."
Tim: We've come back from Babylon, but we're still in exile.
Jon: And because of sense of that we're still exiles, then along with that comes this
complimentary sense of, "This is the land but this is also Babylon." It's this other—
Tim: That's the point at which exile becomes a metaphor for time and a kind of place - for
the geography.
Jon: So I'm in the right place, I'm in the right land that God promised my forefather
Abraham, but it's not in the right state, and won't be in the right state until there's
the right age with the king. And so I'm an exile till this time period, waiting for the
kingdom of God to come. But there's still this hope.
Ultimately, the reason why God promised that Abraham was to bless the nations.
And He was giving Abraham that land for that purpose. Now, jumping forward into
the new covenant with Jesus, who says, "I am what Israel was meant to be, and the
Kingdom of God has come and is coming with me, and go to all the world, go to all
the nations and have people be part of this." So when Paul thinks about Abraham,
he doesn't say Abraham's inheritance was the land, he says, "Abraham's inheritance
was the whole world," because that's ultimately was the goal.
Then you get to Peter, who's talking to non-Jewish people who are now being
invited into the story, who have who have come into the story, and are following
Jesus and the way of this new kingdom, and are identifying more with that kingdom
than their own homes. And because of that, Peter says, "You're in exile." But they're
not in an exile place. They are now realizing they're in exile of the age and their
loyalty is ultimately to a new age.
That longing is telling you, you are in exile. That's what that longing is. That longing
is telling you, you don't actually belong to this. And what do we mean by this? Not
this land, not these relationships, but the state in which it's in.
Tim: This was such a big theme in Lewis' writing of, our life experience, if we look at the
longing that it generates in us, but that are impossible to meet, truly impossible to
meet, he believes that's an indicator of something greater for which we are made
that simply won't be satisfied in our experience of the world as we know it.
Something has to fundamentally change for our experience of desire for love, and
belonging, and identity and purpose.
That those will always be met only with frustration. We'll only have fulfillment in the
world as you and I know it. Which means, not a longing for another place but
another kind of world which this world is destined to become.
Jon: I mean, it will be very much like if you lived in a town that was taken over by another
empire and you are just waiting for the king to come back and say, "Okay, guys, I'm
in charge again. We're going to make it like it used to be."
Tim: Or make it what it's supposed to be.
Jon: But that's just the nostalgia of what you think you want?
Tim: Good analogy. That's great analogy. You just captured the narrative arc in terms of
that longing. You could condense it, but that's a good way of actually uniting all—
Jon: No, I think it should be about 20 minutes long. I think there might be something
there. But then after that, if there's time, you can talk about what does that look like
practically. That's the wisdom warrior. That's the loyalty and subversion.
But I guess we haven't really asked the question is, why is Jesus's ethic and the
Kingdom of God, why is that an answer to your longing? We've never really
explained that.
Tim: Why is that an answer? Well, the answer, what's revealed on the cross is that God is
so committed in love and generosity to making our world what it's supposed to be
that He takes into himself the consequences of our creation of Babylon. I suppose
that's within this kind of way of thinking about it. Because it meets the longing of
home, which is the things I described earlier. Like to know that I am welcome in the
world, that I belong and have a purpose, and I'm loved.
The Christian story I think it's this way of saying that some things might make you
feel that way, but if you're honest, you only partially experience that love, and
welcome, and security, and belonging, even though it's the thing we're all looking
for.
Then those few experiences where we do feel them tend to fade, or will be only
temporary or connected to really unpredictable people, who sometimes love us, and
sometimes don't.
Jon: Think back to the time where you felt most loved, most secure, most at Home, with
the capital H. And if you really dissect it, you'll realize you were only getting whiffs of
what that really is. It was actually compromised in some ways.
Tim: That's why for people who grew up in really, really healthy families, but they
eventually grow up and discover their parents are really just mortal flawed people.
Actually, even children who do grow up in unhealthy families, but still because the
way psychology work, you still idolized your parents. And the moment your parents
are dethroned is demigods or immortals, all of a sudden, the world becomes a little
less stable. For some kids that happens really young, and it's really challenging. But
whatever. We're resilient creatures.
But it's that destabilizing of the world and recognizing like, "Oh, this isn't the place
where my hopes and dreams are really going to come true." And then you have a
question. You can say, "My hopes and dreams were just Utopian fantasies, or do
they point to something that's more ultimate and more real and true?"
The Christian claim is that Jesus is the embodiment of those. It's like God reaching
out into Babylon to tell us that those are mere fantasies and that His ultimate
purpose is to create a world where everyone is welcome, and where everyone has a
place and is loved.
What else does the cross and the resurrection mean except that?
Jon: I guess one temptation is, if I can get you to the point to say, "Yeah, it's true, there is
that longing. I have that longing. I'm not at home," I'll grant you that. But why now
make myself a part of this guy's, the Jesus's kingdom? What makes his kingdom the
right way to find home versus I could probably come up with a way? Why not just go
out on my own? I just feel like we're taking that piece for granted and that's not
what this video is about, I suppose.
Tim: Yeah, but it's a good question.
Jon: I think you spoke to it a little bit.
Tim: Yeah, but I think you can speak to him more. Let's gets back to real classic gospel
kind of stuff. The moment I can say, "Why don't I just adopt this philosophy of life
and accept the world as it comes to me? Instead of trying to make the world a place
that meets my needs to feel like Home, why don't I just accept it as it is?
Jon: The smell of the rose we'll never see is, all I'll get, so I need to learn to enjoy that and
be okay with that and let that longing, that bittersweet sweetness of the longing just
be an end in itself.
Tim: You can go that route. I think that's the route that many Eastern religious traditions
go. Which is to say, deep longings of the human heart for love and life, and the
tragedy that death represents to us, those are illusions. And what we need to do is
learn how to make peace with reality as it actually is, which is ultimately one of
disappointment leading to death.
The more I can shed my individual persona that's looking to meet all these needs,
the more I'll—
Jon: The Christian story is, build a home here and make a garden and pray for it, but
don't give up your hope for Home.
Tim: That's right. Those longings are real because they point to someone who wants to
invite us to be at home in this world and who loves us deeply.
Jon: It was interesting when you're talking about that Eastern mentality of coming peace
with there's goodness, bad and that's just reality and enjoy it for what it is. That's
kind of like saying, "Hey, Daniel, just be a Babylonian."
Tim: Yeah, that's right. "These hopes for Eden and new creation, that was all kind of silly,
wasn't it?"
Jon: Yeah. But be a Babylonian in a very nihilistic way of just kind of like, "Well, I must
enjoy this for what it is. I'm not a Babylonian but this is what I got and I'm going to
enjoy it. I'm going to detach myself enough from this and just experience it."
The biblical answer was, make a home there, but don't make it your ultimate Home."
Tim: "Don't be satisfied."
Jon: You can make home in the sense of there is wisdom in accepting suffering, in
accepting the bad and realizing that it's a mixed bag and every sweet moment also
has bitterness, and every bitter moment has sweetness, and that is life and reality.
And in a way, you can plant a garden in there, but that isn't our true Home. I think
that's an interesting nuance.
[00:26:30]
Tim: It makes me think of when we're talking about Daniel earlier, the ethics of the
wisdom is the practice of radical doubt. You can doubt the Empire and its claims to
define, whatever, ultimate significance, but you can also doubt pleasure. Or our
experiences of beauty that hints of meaning and purpose that we get in a friend or a
loved one or a good meal or gardening.
And it's all doubting those experiences to a certain sense, to say, those are good for
what they are, but they are not the new creation. They're just a whiff of the flower
that I haven't yet smelled. Yes, totally. The biblical is a state of paradox of both
accepting and being grateful for what is beautiful and good in this world, but also
not being satisfied with the world as we know it.
Jon: You are also cool about that "plant a garden" image - then you just used another
one "make a meal" - is an order to garden or to make a meal, there's a lot of mess.
And you've got to kill some things to make a meal especially. And you've got to
really get dirty when you're gardening. And you're dealing with really messy things.
That's the same thing if we're just going to get really abstract and talk about the
existential angst or suffering or depression or loneliness. Those things are real and
you can make a meal out of them. You can plant a garden in them, you could find
good within them.
Tim: Yeah. Those discard pieces become the actual materials out of which—
Jon: And that's the basis of a good Eastern theology, but then you don't go as far as
saying, "Then that's all there is." Because then a biblical theology would say, "And
then actually hope and have allegiance to something greater while you're making a
meal out of it, and making your garden there and marrying your children within it."
Tim: It's the book of Ecclesiastes. The Book of Ecclesiastes is the radical doubt applied to
this existential longing. Then the book of Daniel is radical doubt applied to living
among the empires in this world. I never thought of it that way.
Jon: In a political movement.
Tim: But that's Ecclesiastes. It is "Hey, enjoy goodness for what it is but don't mistake it
for life purpose and meaning or else you're going to be really disappointed."
Jon: There's time for everything, so morn and celebrate—
Tim: Under the sun.
Jon: But fear God and hope ultimately for what He's going to do.
Tim: There's a lot this video could be.
Jon: That'll preach.
Tim: Yeah, totally. I think this is a very powerful theme in the Bible. It's a way of thinking
about the whole story, exile and being at home, exile and homecoming, how to live
in exile not rejecting this place that you are, but also seeing it realistically for what it
is.
I think it was the passion of this Bible scholar, Daniel Smith Christopher. He wrote
two really significant works on it because he thought it was a way that the modern
Western church especially, really needs to listen to this theme in the Bible because it
could help us recover a way of not feeling so comfortable in our culture.
[00:30:07]
Jon: Thank you for listening to this episode of The Bible Project podcast. Our show today
was produced by Dan Gummel, with music by Cody Brotherton at "Hear The Story"
and Andrew Garlucki.
We've got a Q&R episode on exile coming up next. So if you have a question about
anything that we've been discussing around this biblical theme of exile, send it on to
us, info@jointhebibleproject.com. You can record the audio of your question, keep it
to about 20 seconds or so and give us your name and where you live. Looking
forward to responding to your questions next week.
Man: We believe the Bible is a unified story that leads to Jesus. We are a crowdfunded
project by people like me. Find free video, study notes, and more at
thebibleproject.com.